Just like buses, two cases of interest to freelances  concluded this week. After seven years, a contractor named Mark Fitzpatrick has been found to be outside IR35  by a Tier 1 Tribunal. And another imaginative scheme to avoid paying taxes  has been found to be not exactly effective.
The IR35 appeal  has been rumbling on since 2009, when an appeal was lodged against earlier claims relating to contracts dating from 2001, 2003 and 2006. They involved work Mr Fitzpatrick was doing for Airbus since setting up his limited company  in 1996 (same year as me, coincidentally). The details of the case are the usual deeply argued and complex analysis of the facts, but the end result was mainly that because Mr Fitzpatrick’s contractual arrangements failed to demonstrate mutuality  he was not in the scope of IR35.
The reasons given for this conclusion are, to the informed reader, blindingly obvious. Mr Fitzpatrick (and others) had been sent home without pay when their IT systems failed and they could not do any meaningful work. Also Airbus could cancel Mr Fitzpatrick’s company’s contract at any time without notice.
The attentive reader may recall me raising this issue of no notice in the past. I’ve long argued that while some week’s notice on both sides may be commercially advantageous, any notice period  implies you may be paid for work when there is no work to be done – else why has your contract been terminated?
Still it this is HMRC  we are talking about: taking three years to decide a clearly un-winnable case is winnable and another three to discover what any half-informed contractor  could have explained in a few minutes is a mere bagatelle.
The other worrying part of this case perhaps warrants wider examination. On of the witness’s evidence was dismissed by the Judge, for several reasons, one of which was that it appeared to have been prepared for him by HMRC. So not exactly impartial evidence then….
The other case concerned a company called Aberdeen Asset Management, who had contrived a scheme to save a few million pounds of tax and NICs  for its directors. The judge in that case carefully and completely destroyed their case in a 10-point judgement.
Looking at the detail of the case it was clear that it was perhaps doomed to failure. It was not an EBT  – although an EBT was part of the daisy chain of intermediate companies and itself paid out to some 400 other people (who presumably are now looking over their shoulders) – and was benefiting its own employees rather than any third parties, so shouts of glee from other scheme providers that this was nothing to do with the ongoing arguments about contractors using EBTs and set no precedents were to be expected.
Except for two small details. Firstly, that HMRC are clearly aiming to shut down any and all schemes that they perceive to be artificially created in order solely to avoid taxation . Secondly, as the Aberdeen Asset case proves, HMRC are not bothered how long it takes to get its tax back, but get its tax back it certainly will. And if you have to sell the house and the children to pay it, well tough but them’s the rules.
All of which leads to an interesting dichotomy. On one hand we have HMRC pursuing a case that was clearly un-winnable for 10 years, costing several tens of thousands and recovering absolutely nothing beyond egg on their collective face. On the other we have HMRC spending ten years to pursue a case against a scheme that was clearly never going to fly and eventually regaining a few millions in unpaid taxes.
Such tenacity is to be admired, in a way. But such a shame that HMRC lacks the wit to work out which case to spend ten years on in the first place.
About the author: Alan Watts
Alan has worked in IT for most of the last 35 years, and first went freelance in 1996. He has been a PCG member from its start and has been spreading the message that freelancing is a professional career choice for many years. Alan also runs Malvolio’s Blog, a personal but highly informative take on the life of the modern freelance.
Alan Watts, Principal Consultant, LPW Computer Services 
© 2011 All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited<
Image: Rosie  by Chris Barber