Tag Archive | "Inside IR35"

2010 – a year of change and opportunity for contractors?


Contractors may have breathed a sigh of relief following the pre-budget report having found little changed. However can any tax payer really expect to pay the same tax/NIC post general election?

Considering the state of the UK’s finances the answer has to be a resounding no. The electioneering has begun and we hear calls from one party for a £10K nil rate tax band, accusations from the current incumbents of a forthcoming class war but the emphasis from all three main parties is clearly on fairness.

IR35

Public campaigns for the repeal of IR35 have so far failed. If they had succeeded it would be unrealistic in the extreme to expect in its place a system where less or even the same tax/NIC is generated from those operating through limited companies.

The Agency Workers Directive (AWD) calls for a definition of the genuinely self-employed and suggests that those outside IR35 would also be outside the AWD. This new legislation presents a real opprtunity for end clients and agencies to understand and address the issues of employment status. We could at last see an end to engagers who want all of the controls over the freelancer as an “employer” but with none of the responsibilities that an employment relationship brings. The AWD in its current form also addresses the perceived unfairness with regard to employment rights for those inside IR35.

Umbrella Companies

Arguably expenses for Umbrella users were saved thanks to the Daily Telegraph! The future is the flexible workforce and there is still an important role for umbrella companies to play. HMRC has fired several warning shots regarding Umbrellas use of over- arching contracts of employment and it seems there are numerous ones out there that do not work. Returning to the issue of fairness and the fact that agency workers generally cannot claim expenses the Umbrella user may find him/herself in the same position as the PAYE agency worker.

Changes

Brace yourselves for a change of government, an emergency budget and more tax to pay.

Opportunities

New regulations bring opportunities for education and better understanding of employment status issues by all the parties in the contractual chain which is good news for Contractors.

In the meantime we still have IR35 and Umbrella expenses schemes and HMRC is very much out there using its new powers and spending its enormous budget on compliance work. 2010 is going to be a year for all contractors to take notice of the changes and the opportunities and consider their positions accordingly.

Kate Cotterell is Managing Director of Bauer & Cotterell.
© 2009 All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

Image: dice by QwirkSilver

Posted in contractor faqs, ir35 rules, newsComments (1)

As a contractor, what impact will IR35 have on my take home pay?


Choose a Name: The name has to be unique, obviously, and not likely to be confused for someone else’s existing name. The best reference point is the Companies House website – www.companieshouse.gov.uk – which has a simple search facility so you can check your chosen version. Also, try to avoid names that are specifically related to your line of work, just in case you want to change careers later: imagine selling cars though a company called Al’s Bakery.
Decide on Share Ownership: Is this just you, or you and your spouse, or you and two or three other people? This is important, because it defines how to allocate the Ordinary Shares In the company. Dividends are paid in direct proportion to numbers of shares held. A husband and wife typically have 50% each, for example, but if one is already earning money, be aware of the impact of the share income on their tax position. Share allocation can be changed after the event. There are several variations on share management; but for anything other than a simple allocation of ordinary shares, get expert advice.
Register at Companies House: There is an online system you use to set up your company and pay the registration fee. It is fairly simple to use. One question it will ask is who the directors are. For a typical small contractor company you only need one but there’s no reason not to have more. Although not strictly necessary any more, it also helps to nominate a Company Secretary: this could be the same person, but it’s more sensible to have someone else, a partner or relative for example.
Register a Memorandum of Association: Something else to do while you are at Companies House. At its simplest this is a document describing what your company is for and how you wish to run it. You can do it yourself, but the document can have legal implications in a tax investigation so do some online research for a suitable template from sites such as www.simply-docs.co.uk or www.clickdocs.co.uk.
Set up a Bank Account: This has to be a business bank account. Banks are increasingly wary of new business accounts, so you will have to answer some detailed questions and it will help if you have some professional references and a signed contact to demonstrate you actually will have an income.
Register for VAT: You have to do this if your annual income is in excess of a set amount (currently £67,000 pa) but it Is advantageous to register anyway. VAT and the Flat Rate Scheme are discussed in more detail elsewhere.
And that’s it. It sounds complicated but is in fact quite straightforward. You can also take the easy way out; either use a company formation agent, or there are several accountants who specialise in contractors who will set up all if the above for you for a small fee, or even for free, as well as providing expert support. Finally keep track of all your various expenses setting the company up, since you can reclaim these once you start trading.

While it is fair to say that IR35 will have an impact on your own net income, quantifying exactly how much impact is not that simple, since there are several variables. You can, however, compare the overall results in general terms.

There are basically four ways to get paid as a freelance contractor: under normal PAYE, either on a fixed term contract or as an agency employee, through an Umbrella company, with your own company operating inside IR35 or with your own company operating outside IR35.

Normal PAYE

Whether you are on a Fixed Term Contract – essentially a normal employment contract but with a pre-agreed termination date – or are employed by the agency who found the work, you will be treated as a normal employee for tax purposes and pay all the usual taxes and NICs. Expenses are very much at the discretion of the employer or agency, but will be limited.

IR35 cannot apply and hence has zero impact.

Umbrella Company Contractor

You are in effect an employee of the umbrella and so IR35 cannot apply. Once again, you pay full PAYE and NICS on your income. However, out of your gross you also have to pay Employers NICs (usually the contract rate will have been raised to cover this cost) and the umbrella’s service fees. You can, however claim various working expenses that will reduce your overall tax burden; in effect the costs you incur by working become tax-free income. Beware, though, that all such expenses have to be justified and verifiable and treat claims by umbrellas that they have generous expense policies to increase your take-home with a degree of caution. The umbrella will also make other deductions to cover various statutory requirements such as holiday pay and pensions

The end result is you will take home more net income than straight PAYE, precisely how much depends on your level of working expenses.

Own Company inside IR35

At its simplest, and starting with your gross income from the contract, you can deduct 5% to cover operating costs of having your own company, allowable business expenses such as travel and equipment costs, Employers NICs paid during the year and any salary paid during the year. The balance remaining is the “Deemed” income and is liable to full PAYE and NICs.

In terms of overall impact, you are paying tax on 95% of your gross rather than the 100% if you are working through an umbrella, so there is a small benefit to this approach.

Own Company outside IR35

You can set a salary level of your choosing and then take any post-tax profits in the form of dividends, which are not liable to NICs. Setting a gross salary to the same as the tax free personal allowance therefore means you can save significant amounts of taxation. You offset salary payments, working expenses and other costs such as training (which is not allowable under IR35) and pension payments against your gross, pay Corporation Tax on the net profit, the balance being the amount available to you as dividends. You can also leave some or all of those profits in the company for later years.

The overall impact is that you will retain a higher percentage of your gross income than through any other route. However, it does mean that you have to be certain of your IR35 status.

© 2009 All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

Image: Meteorite impact by larkspurlazuli

Posted in ir35 insurance, ir35 rulesComments (0)

IR35 – So Let’s Use “Control” to Our Advantage


We know (or we should know) that Control is a key element in determining your IR35 status. To be precise, one of the key characteristics of a Master/Servant relationship, on which employment tests are based, is that the worker is under the Direction and Control of the end client.  The D&C test used in IR35 cases is based on the premise that if the Client can tell you where and how to perform your work, then an employee-like relationship exists and you are inside IR35.
Except, of course, it really isn’t that simple. Control may look like a black and white distinction, but in fact it is many shades of grey. Is it Control if the client insists a first-line support worker is on site at the same time as the users they are there to support? Or the worker has to use the client’s hardware, usually because the client doesn’t want someone else’s equipment plugged into his network (and he doesn’t see why he should spend time and effort validating such equipment for use)? Or that the worker has to adhere to the client’s coding standards? Or that a tester has to have his work periodically reviewed for quality?
All the above have actually been argued in recent IR35 cases. Only one was found to represent control. That was in Dragonfly, which judgement was sufficiently off the wall that it can be ignored in this context (although what Dragonfly did settle is that reality and contract have to be aligned).
Actually I suspect this whole issue of D&C, to the client, is very simple: they want the worker to deliver what they want delivering and usually aren’t all that bothered about precisely how it is delivered. The people that get worked up about where contractors sit and when they are at their desk are usually the middle managers, not the executive
Also, the reason it gains such prominence in agency contracts is nothing to do with IR35 but everything to do with whose fault it is if the worker screws up. The agency wants the client to be “in control” because then if the worker does make a mess of things, there’s no comeback on the agency. This, of course, ignores the fact that most agencies actually sell their services on the basis of having their very own stable of excellent people readily to hand.
Either way, what we need is a clear definition of Control in the context of a client/worker relationship. And that could then be used to our advantage. If that definition exists as an accepted term, then we can say to the client that Control is exercised or it is not. If it is, and you want full control over my work, then you are responsible for paying my taxes and I’ll take the balance, because you want to treat me as an employee, then you can have the extra overheads that an employee would demand. If it is not, then pay me gross and I am liable for all my taxes; in fact the relationship is now clear, so why not use a simple B2B contract in stead of that complex, ambiguous pseudo-employment one you’re used to having?
And if we can do all of that, then IR35 evaporates in a puff of smoke…

We know (or we should know) that Control is a key element in determining your IR35 status. To be precise, one of the key characteristics of a Master/Servant relationship, on which employment tests are based, is that the worker is under the Direction and Control of the end client.

Direction & Control

The D&C test used in IR35 cases is based on the premise that if the Client can tell you where and how to perform your work, then an employee-like relationship exists and you are inside IR35.

Except, of course, it really isn’t that simple. Control may look like a black and white distinction, but in fact it is many shades of grey. Is it Control if the client insists a first-line support worker is on site at the same time as the users they are there to support? Or the worker has to use the client’s hardware, usually because the client doesn’t want someone else’s equipment plugged into his network (and he doesn’t see why he should spend time and effort validating such equipment for use)? Or that the worker has to adhere to the client’s coding standards? Or that a tester has to have his work periodically reviewed for quality?

All the above have actually been argued in recent IR35 cases. Only one was found to represent control. That was in Dragonfly, which judgement was sufficiently off the wall that it can be ignored in this context (although what Dragonfly did settle is that reality and contract have to be aligned).

Actually I suspect this whole issue of D&C, to the client, is very simple: they want the worker to deliver what they want delivering and usually aren’t all that bothered about precisely how it is delivered. The people that get worked up about where contractors sit and when they are at their desk are usually the middle managers, not the executive

Also, the reason it gains such prominence in agency contracts is nothing to do with IR35 but everything to do with whose fault it is if the worker screws up. The agency wants the client to be “in control” because then if the worker does make a mess of things, there’s no comeback on the agency. This, of course, ignores the fact that most agencies actually sell their services on the basis of having their very own stable of excellent people readily to hand.

IR35 Definition

Either way, what we need is a clear definition of Control in the context of a client/worker relationship. And that could then be used to our advantage. If that definition exists as an accepted term, then we can say to the client that Control is exercised or it is not. If it is, and you want full control over my work, then you are responsible for paying my taxes and I’ll take the balance, because you want to treat me as an employee, then you can have the extra overheads that an employee would demand. If it is not, then pay me gross and I am liable for all my taxes; in fact the relationship is now clear, so why not use a simple B2B contract in stead of that complex, ambiguous pseudo-employment one you’re used to having?

And if we can do all of that, then IR35 evaporates in a puff of smoke…

© 2009 All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited

Image: Kids, be nice or I shoot by Stefan

Posted in ir35 rulesComments (0)


stay up to date:

behind the scenes

Gone for a stroll Spaceman Wanna be spaceman Off for a pint...or two? Look at the size of it! Marathon Des Sables
View more photos >

our top 5 twitter posts

contractor accountants

contractoraccts



Join the conversation
Free Telephone Advice